2023.06.03 18:14 Objective_Ice2526 New Grad Needing Opinions
2023.06.03 18:07 SirZanee Hmm
![]() | submitted by SirZanee to Shitty_Car_Mods [link] [comments] |
2023.06.03 17:40 baileyswithcoffee 2011 Ford Escape XLT rpm/shifting issues after replacing throttle body
2023.06.03 16:47 PossessionItchy7676 2024 Carnival Sx-Prestige
![]() | 2024 Carnival SX-Prestige Flare Red exterior Gray interior 7 Seater configuration(VIP SEATS) NO RES $47,665+1194(ADM) $500 fully refundable deposit to reserve in transit to be here any day contact at 929-230-4730 submitted by PossessionItchy7676 to kiacarnivals [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/qby12rgtft3b1.png?width=1470&format=png&auto=webp&s=b8aca04455d31bbe0f19ffea1829dfdd12ae7e9e |
2023.06.03 16:17 Turbulent-Papaya-910 Help on removing resonator assembly (?) clip from engine
2023.06.03 16:06 SAthrowway2301 My wife is destroying my relationship with my son
2023.06.03 15:13 ruthiess18 Help me find out what’s wrong please
2023.06.03 15:03 rcreveli 2011 Fuel Door Question P0456
2023.06.03 13:31 Consistent-Cheek7860 Which model could this be?
2023.06.03 13:27 DisastrousAbalone706 Car Stolen
2023.06.03 12:11 NoIndication7810 Career? I want to be a dentist. Had hard life growing up. My career is important to me⬇️
submitted by NoIndication7810 to vedicastrology [link] [comments]
2023.06.03 11:17 Wild_Development9739 Spotting in USA until a Hypercar is found (excluding CA, FL & TX) - PT.2
2023.06.03 08:33 specterspectating Something something taillights…idk I don’t follow donut media
![]() | submitted by specterspectating to WRX [link] [comments] |
2023.06.03 05:18 ndlacajunwiseguy 2020 (goldilocks) ridgeline with modifications
![]() | Wanted to post the 2020 ridgeline (goldilocks...I like the old style, but has the new transmission) version that I bought new before all the pandemic weirdness submitted by ndlacajunwiseguy to hondaridgeline [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/qixi4kqf1q3b1.jpg?width=2560&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f7cba60d921b75a67aebefa6198f2d7135dd6d5f https://preview.redd.it/rrlqrnqf1q3b1.jpg?width=2560&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3cbff889786fd604a0f2bd2e5556053ec1bcb58d https://preview.redd.it/gd8y6dqf1q3b1.jpg?width=2560&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d8486f9efce244f1051933781e8351ad239a2e3b Modifications 1: 2 inch traxda lift. This is really the sweet spot, going over really runs up the price and 2 inches puts it on par with the taco/rangecolorado that run next to you 2: firestone destination at2 265/60-18 . No rub on full lock forward/reverse. Reason for getting was white lettering and the reviews were very positive on highway manners and wet performance. Wet performance is big for me since I am driving in the wet a good majority of the time. 2A: Tires plus lift is roughly 2 1/2 inches up. Wife: why did you make it so high? its hard to get into! me: muahahah 3: under body protection of mostly no low design front skid, front diff and catalytic protection (mostly to slow down/prevent someone going after my cat...its a thing in my area) 3a: front skid plate NEEDS replacement m6 bolts on the front that are automotive grade class 10.9. The stock bolts are meant to hold a tin shield and they will loosen and cause a bunch of creaking/groaning. If you attempt to tighten..they just break. 4: fog lights are diode dynamics SLF white, the 780 lumens is a great match and does not over power the main headlights. They are actually very useful in our dark and rainy nights here in Louisiana! 5: Brush guard, I think this was CarID...but not even sure you can buy anymore. It was roughly $350 at the time. Downside is the top tabs running under the hood...I had to take a stainless pad to them and really scour them and put on real black paint that could stand up to the rain. The stock coating rusted very quickly. 6: AEM drop in air filter. Clean/wash it every 3 months...works great. 7: CarID for the dash cover, I keep my vehicles for a long time and most end up with cracked dashes so wanted to prevent that on this ridgeline. Plus I could geek out and put my gamer handle embroided on it...kids/wife roll eyes... me dont care. 8: Steering wheel cover off amazon for $20, keeps the steering wheel in great shape and the aftermarket is really decent. 9: Full size spare on the back. This takes some amazon...you need a m8 140 to 160mm in length. I got the 160mm in length from England and its just a tad too long. I used rubber spacers on the stock insert. The stock tire holder requires a new hole, I screwed in my bolt...put some paint on the top and put the tire on with the stock holder. It showed me where the bolt hit the stock holder and voila...drilled my hole there. Its pretty much right on the edge..like 2mm off the edge if you need to guess. I put the bolt in and put a rubber spacer (again 160mm is a tad long, 150mm would be perfect) and just used a ratchet to screw it in. Is the view out of the back window great? No, but it beats the tire just lying in the back. I would love the tire to be side mounted on the bed behind the driver...but I don't know how to fabri-coble such a beast. 10: threw the engine cover away...I like to hear the engine. 11: Yes....I put a honda Trailsport badge on it. Its the version of the 2020 ridgeline that is really trail rated, but never made. haha...true unicorn 12: Put ceramic tint on the front windows. Its a bit less then the stock rear so nobody questions it and its a good look imho. I had it done professionally and it looks stock and has held up for 3 years with zero problems...and it really does block out the UV. They were also the same shop that installed the traxda lift, it was unique for them since they do a LOT of custom lifts...but never a ridgeline. What I like: 1:Payload is great, I've really pushed it a few times with 1700lbs...but it handled it like a champ every time. 2:Towing is fine, small trailer for my daughters band, a few boats, etc. I do need to install a brake controller on the off chance it hits 4k lbs or more. 3:Ride is great...way better than most every truck I've driven 4:Handling is vastly better in the corners, I can really whip this thing into a tight turn and not end up plowing or bouncing like mad....this is NOT something you want to do on a taco/rangecolorado. 5:More height on the sidewalls makes a real difference in handling pot holes...ride is not as jarring. We don't have great roads here in Louisiana. 6:I use the in bed speakers waaay more than I ever thought I would. 7:Love the transmission 8:making people regret not getting a ridgeline after they borrow my truck for the weekend 9: its pretty damn unique in town, I mean ridgeline is already pretty much "wheres waldo?" in a sea of ford/chevy/dodge/toyota...but this puts it into the unicorn status 10: oh yeah..cabin space is awesome! 11: trunk really keeps the cabin clean...just toss it in the trunk! What you need to accept: 1: acceleration takes a hit with more weight and bigger tires 2: gas mileage goes down. stock height/tires it was easy to get 25-29mpg, now its around 21. I drive like a monkey in town...17 3: Head unit is slooow. It doesn't crash/freeze...but it is slow. Basically android auto is your friend. 4: getting it aligned takes more than your usual shop. They have to work with lifted trucks...your normal shop has no clue on how to get this aligned. I took it to 2 shops, multiple times..fails. I then looked around for an alignment shop that knew wtf to do with modified trucks and it finally was done right. 5: eco mode in town is death...it takes so much off the acceleration that to turn into traffic is: ok..barely going..push more pedal...hmm still not moving...more pedal...damn they are right there! mash it to the floor! Sum up: I am totally that crescent wrench guy....I don't do anything that well, but can toss myself into most situations and make it work. This is my perfect truck in that it can do pretty much anything I ask it and my daughters are learning to drive on this as it has most of the modern safety features. |
2023.06.03 05:04 labor-attorney Criteria and Methods for Selection of Employee Representatives
![]() | https://preview.redd.it/uj21m4y9yp3b1.jpg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=820cf26ccbfc07a2b448190d8bad0a944169c3a0 submitted by labor-attorney to Korean_Law [link] [comments] Criteria and Methods for Selection of Employee Representatives I. Introduction I received questions regarding the selection of employee representatives from Company D, for whom collective bargaining negotiations are underway. Company D is a manufacturing enterprise with a workforce consisting of 50 production workers and 30 office workers, totaling 80 employees. There are two labor unions composed of production workers only, with the majority union, Union 1, consisting of 30 members, and a minority union, Union 2, consisting of 20 members. Union 1 serves as the negotiating representative union. Despite not being a majority union, the chairman of the minority union, Union 2, has garnered support from a significant number of clerical workers and is acting as an employee representative in the labor-management council. The company needed a written agreement with the employee representative regarding working on holidays and taking time off on “substitute holidays” instead. The first question raised by Company D is whether the employee representative in the labor-management council (representing Union 2) can be the party with whom an agreement can be reached on changes to the substitute holidays. The company has announced the selection of an employee representative for the purpose of substituting holidays for all employees. In response, the Chairman of Union 2, upon seeing the company's request for the appointment of an employee representative, obtained the consent of a portion of its own members (it did not include any members of Union 1) and some white-collar workers through a consent form circulated among the employees, which received majority consent. The second question is whether the current employee representative in the labor-management council can be recognized as the party with whom a written agreement can be made regarding the substitute holidays, based on the consent form that obtained the consent of the majority of employees. In relation to this, I will examine specific criteria and provide an answer. II. Validity of Employee Representative Selection 1. Reasons to Select an Employee Representative While individual working conditions are determined by employment contracts, the determination of collective working conditions shall follow the principles in the Labor Standards Act regarding equal decision-making between labor and management. According to Article 4 of that Act, "Working conditions shall be determined through free and voluntary agreement between workers and employers, on the basis of equality." Based on this principle, changes in collective working conditions require written agreement of the employee representative.[1] An “employee representative” refers to a labor union organized by the majority of employees in cases where such a labor union exists, or an individual representing the majority of employees if there is no labor union representing the majority of employees. Specifically, the role of an employee representative under the Labor Standards Act can be divided into three categories. First, when employers seek to change statutory working hours according to the Labor Standards Act and implement flexible, optional or discretionary working hours, compensatory leave, or alternative paid leave, they are required to obtain written agreement of the employee representative. Unilaterally changing the statutory working hours (40 hours per week, 8 hours per day) by the employer can lead to criminal punishment. However, if written agreement is obtained from the employee representative, there will be no criminal punishment.[2] Second, for management layoffs, employers are required to engage in prior consultations with the employee representative. “Management layoffs” refer to cases where the company undergoes restructuring due to unavoidable business difficulties, without fault on the part of the employees. When implementing management layoffs, employers must notify the employee representative 50 days in advance, make efforts to avoid layoffs, and engage in sincere consultations regarding the employees to be laid off. The consultation process with the employee representative is a critical requirement for justifying the legitimacy of management layoffs (Article 24 of the Labor Standards Act). Third, when making adverse changes to working conditions stipulated in the rules of employment, the consent of a majority of employees is necessary. In the case we are discussing herein, the consent of the employee representative representing the majority of employees is necessary. Changes to working conditions that do not receive consent of the employee representative shall be legally ineffective (Article 94 of the Labor Standards Act). 2. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL) Guidelines and Precedents Related to Selection of an Employee Representative (1) MOEL Guidelines Under the Labor Standards Act, “employee representative” refers to an entity/individual representing the majority of employees within a specific business or workplace unit. Therefore, in principle, the employee representative shall be elected for the entire business. However, if certain provisions apply to specific occupations or job categories, solely basing selection of the employee representative on the entire workforce of the business might fail to adequately represent the interests of the affected employees. In regards to the "majority of employees in the business or workplace" mentioned in Article 94 of the Labor Standards Act concerning changes to rules of employment, the Supreme Court has stated that "if the adverse changes to the rules of employment only affect a specific group of employees and do not apply or are not expected to apply to other employee groups, then only the affected employee group becomes the subject of consent for the changes to the rules of employment."[3] Therefore, when introducing flexible working hour systems limited to specific occupations or job categories (such as facility workers), it would be permissible to select an employee representative who represents the majority of employees within that specific occupation or job category. The employee representative in such cases should be elected or determined through democratic methods such as voting or polling, involving the participation of a majority of employees in that occupation or job category. [4] (2) Related Precedents 1) When multiple employee groups are part of a single system of working conditions and even if only one employee group directly suffers from the adverse changes to the rules of employment, if application of the changed rules is expected to affect other employee groups, both the directly affected employee group and the employee groups that can anticipate future application of the changed rules become the subjects of consent. However, if the working conditions are differentiated, and the changed rules only apply to specific employee groups, resulting in direct disadvantages for those specific employee groups, without anticipation that the changed rules will apply to other employee groups, only the disadvantaged employee group(s) become the subject of consent.[5] 2) In a case where a hospital laid off employees ranked 4th grade or higher, the Supreme Court stated that "when a hospital seeks to downsize primarily employees of 4th grade or higher, it is also necessary to engage in consultations with the employee representative who can represent the interests of the employees in that rank. In this case, the employee representative claiming to have engaged in consultations regarding the layoffs consists mostly of employees ranked 5th grade or lower, temporary employees, and non-administrative staff, and since the majority of union members in the labor union, composed mainly of employees ranked 5th grade or lower, are not the target of layoffs and have little connection to the layoffs, it is unreasonable to consider the selection of the employee representative as fair."[6] 3) The Seoul Administrative Court determined that "if an employer intends to carry out layoffs targeting only certain ranks of employees, unless there are exceptional circumstances otherwise, they shall engage in consultations with a representative who can represent the affected employees. It is not permissible to engage in consultations with a labor union that lacks representativeness. If interpreted differently, it would result in entrusting the fate of certain employee groups to individuals who cannot adequately reflect the opinions and interests of those certain employee groups."[7] III. Validity of Method Used in Selecting an Employee Representative 1. Principles of Employee Representative Selection If there is a labor union representing the majority of employees, that union becomes the employee representative. If there is no labor union representing the majority of employees, an individual shall be chosen who represents the majority of employees. Therefore, in cases where a majority labor union does not exist, a separate election shall be held to select an employee representative who represents the majority of the employees. Labor laws do not provide any specific regulations regarding the election of such an employee representative. Therefore, a fair procedure is necessary to adequately reflect the intentions of the employees in the respective business or workplace. Such a procedure shall involve a democratic election method that obtains the support of the majority of employees and does not allow for employer appointment or nomination.[8] 2. Precedents regarding Selection of an Employee Representative 1) Selection of an employee representative shall follow a collective decision-making method, such as an election (including a meeting-based approach). The election of an employee representative shall be determined through an appropriate method (including anonymous voting) that allows individual employees to freely express their opinions in a meeting where employees gather in the same location. The elected individual, chosen by the majority of employees based on the results of such a process, shall be appointed as the employee representative.[9] 2) Selecting an employee representative through individual circulation and signing cannot be considered a valid election method.[10] However, in exceptional cases where employees are dispersed across multiple workplaces or when it is not feasible to hold elections or meetings at the same location, a method where employees freely nominate employee representatives by workplace or department and consolidate those nominations is permitted.[11] 3) In cases where a majority labor union does not exist, designating labor-management council workers as employee representatives without a separate election procedure is not recognized. This is because the labor-management council serves a different legal purpose, with limited decision-making authority, while the flexible working hour system performs functions related to determining employment conditions.[12] IV. Answers to Questions Regarding Employee Representatives
If the exercise of employee representative authority is explicitly specified and communicated in a manner that is easily recognized by the employees, such as through prior notice and public disclosure of the fact that the elected labor-management council worker will exercise employee representative authority, then that labor-management council worker can be considered an employee representative.[14] In the case of Company D's labor-management council, however, there was no such prior notice during the selection of labor-management council workers, and therefore, they cannot serve as workplace employee representatives.
Administrative interpretations suggest that when there is no labor union organized by a majority of employees, the appointment process and method for the individual representing the majority of employees should be communicated to all employees, allowing for a voluntary and democratic selection process that does not restrict the participation of other candidates and recognizes the majority representation of employees.[15] In this case, the workplace has a primary labor union, and negotiations between the primary union, representing union members' employment conditions, and the employer are ongoing. However, in the current situation, the labor-management council's employee representative violated the selection procedure by obtaining and submitting a circulatory consent form secretly, without undergoing a transparent opinion-gathering process. Therefore, that person cannot be recognized as an employee representative. V. Conclusion The employee representative system is an important mechanism that limits unilateral decision-making by employers regarding employment conditions in workplaces where there is no labor union representing the majority of employees. However, the current employee representative system is temporary and lacks guarantees for the position of employee representatives. Additionally, no specific methods for the selection process of employee representatives have been provided, causing confusion in workplaces. Therefore, there is a need for institutional improvements in the operation, term assurance, and permanent establishment of the employee representative system.[16] We hope that through improvement of the employee representative system, the fundamental principle of equal decision-making on employment conditions, as stated in the Labor Standards Act, can be realized in all workplaces. [1] Kim, Mi-young & Park, Eun-jeong, "Workplace Autonomy, Labor-Management Council, and Employee Representatives," Labor Law Forum, Vol. 34 (2021), p. 122. [2] Lee, Seung-wook, "A Study on Measures for Improving the Employee Representative System in Labor Relations Law," Ministry of Employment and Labor, p. 25. [3] Supreme Court ruling on May 28, 2009, 2009doo2238. [4] MOEL Guidelines, Labor Standards section-1356, May 7, 2021. [5] Supreme Court ruling on May 28, 2009, 2009doo2238. [6] Supreme Court ruling on Sept. 29, 2005, 2005doo4403. [7] Seoul Administrative Court ruling on Aug. 22, 2000, 99goo27292. [8] Do, Jae-hyung, “Labor Representatives and the Written Agreement System under the Labor Standards Act,” Labor Law Studies, Vol. 37, 2011, p. 102. [9] Supreme Court ruling on July 26, 1977, 773da355. [10] Supreme Court ruling on June 24, 1994, 92da28556. [11] Supreme Court ruling on May 12, 2005, 2003da52456. [12] Supreme Court ruling on June 24, 1994, 92da28556. [13] Kim, Kisun, "Regulatory Status and Legislative Issues of the Employee Representative System in Labor Relations Law" National Assembly Legislative Research Institute, 2016, p. 64; Supreme Court ruling on June 24, 1994, 92Da28556. [14] MOEL Guidelines, Labor Standards section-1356, May 7, 2021. [15] MOEL Guidelines (Selection of Employee Representatives in the Absence of a Majority Labor Union in the Workplace) Sanjae Prevention Policy-3144, June 28, 2021. [16] Park, Ji-Soon, "The Concept of the Korean Employee Representative System," Labor Law Review, Vol. 42, April 2018, pp. 8-10; Lee, Seung-Wook, "Directions for Improving the Employee Representative System," Economic and Social Labor Commission, May 2019, p. 123. |
2023.06.03 03:53 specterspectating How long before I’m downvoted into oblivion if I post this in the other sub? 😂
![]() | submitted by specterspectating to wrx_vb [link] [comments] |
2023.06.03 03:40 MochaAllen Broken line
![]() | I was filling up my wiper fluid and noticed this. How do I proceed? 2006 Ford Taurus. submitted by MochaAllen to autorepair [link] [comments] |
2023.06.03 03:24 wtfwafflezor (Selling) 800 Titles Dungeons & Dragons Vudu HD iTunes 4K $8 Batman 2022 Vudu HD $2.50
2023.06.03 03:22 relevancybox Used car purchase - toyota rav 4 with 68,000 miles or toyota Highlander with 110,000 miles ? Same year, Highlander 1.5k more expensive
2023.06.03 02:25 ruthiess18 Help me identify what’s wrong please
2023.06.03 01:56 PyroShotGaming Trying my luck here again for help, this time with video.
![]() | Grinding noise when accelerating and turning on 2014 Ford Taurus submitted by PyroShotGaming to MechanicAdvice [link] [comments] My car makes a grinding/whining noise when I accelerate the car and is noticeable when turning the steering wheel left or right . However, when I switch the gear to Reverse, the noise stops . The noise also stops when I don’t accelerate. However after driving for a while the noise goes completely and comes back the next day when I start the car up. I think it could be the wheel bearing or something with the drivetrain or transmission . Any help would be greatly appreciated |
2023.06.02 23:53 NoahBishop1979 I really didn’t want to do this